Story by Toyo C. Ngem, Biola Aina & Eniola David
AT the 2019 Biennial Convention of the
Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE) held on Saturday, May 4, at Airport Hotel,
Ikeja, the thrust of the eminent speakers' address was yet a repeat of the
charge to the media to embrace the highest standard of professionalism required
of the industry. In the context of that, the Vice-president, Professor Yemi
Osinbajo, advised the practitioners to weed out quacks from the industry in
order to maintain the sanctity of the profession of journalism.
He expressed
the distraught of government over the practice direction of what he called “the
new media” he by himself revealed to be referring to online journalism that
strives to compete on the race speed of first-to-break-the-news. He believed this
habit was badly eroding the convention of fact-checking upon which the core
value of journalism rests. “What we see today is that instant reporting is
making mincemeat of the virtues of cross-checking facts before publishing”, he
said.
Vice President of Nigeria, Professor Yemi Osinbajo |
He said:
“Since the role of editors is quality control and gate keeping, of things they
must do is to manage the new media (online/social media) and place some form of
control. Some people must take the lead to speak up against the bastardisation
of the new media as it is gradually relegating investigative journalism”.
Really,
professor Osinbajo's elocution on this rot in media practice appeared to be
limitedly located to the online platform where he believed the 'quacks' existed
in “mushroom” multitudes of viral cankerworms that are rather destroying the
collective integrity value of the general media across board to the terrestrial
orthodox platform too. “The editors must now take over the online media as
seriously as they did to the traditional media and that move has to be
unprecedented”, Osinbajo said.
It was not
known by what barometric data the Vice-president concluded the den of
prevailing media ethical rots to be the online platform alone. Or to make it
more aggressively sensible, this magazine believes he had passed the wrong
message to the right audience. More in the words of Brian Browne, the
Vice-president simply seemed to 'ignore the viper at his heels to nurse the
fear of a tiger yet at great distance'.
Less than two
months after, the Vice-president was to become the next first person to suffer
his neglect of the many editors of conventional 'old' media in that audience as
the real certificated quacks he had besieged for a solution to the entrenched
unprofessional and ethically debased media industry in Nigeria. The Punch newspaper's fangs of venomous
editorial quackery just struck him hard near his jugular vein.
On Saturday,
July 13, the newspaper published a story on a seeming corrupt suspicion about
Vice-president Osinbajo. But whatever the significance of that publication was
to The Punch, it simply came forth to
the discernible minds as a good case study beholding a poser that justifiably
queries the education pedigree of the ubiquitous certificated quacks holding
forth the trust of people in the Fourth Estate of the Realm.
Entitled
“Osinbajo's firm linked to company fingered in Alpha Beta scam” as the headline
of that Saturday edition, The Punch
newspaper accused the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) of a
deliberate plot to bury a petition written by one Dapo Apara against a firm,
Alpha Beta, with allegation of tax evasion and a N100billion money laundering
scam. However, the newspaper story by primary intent held that the EFCC's
deliberate negligence and dereliction of duty over the petition was the
handwork of Vice-president Osinbajo, who, as implied, was using his office to
stall the investigation because he had an official relationship with the
company, Ocean Trust Limited, through which the Alpha Beta laundered the
N100billion. The newspaper strived to justify this claim by positing that a
legal firm, Simmonscooper Partners, in which the Vice-president 'is' a
co-founder was the “Company Secretary” – call it legal unit if you like – to
the Ocean Trust Limited.
But going by
the series of rejoinders that would later trail the story from both the EFCC
and other corporate organisations felt derided by the report, the publication
soon rather exposed The Punch
newspaper as much a big player in the mischievous use of the print media for
character assassination and purveyor of fake news via both the Osinbajo's “New
Media” – online platform – and the 'old' print-media platform. It is however
noteworthy to state that the pang of collateral damage on the EFCC from The Punch's fang-bite on Osinbajo made
the privilege for the reading public to see how the major media editors do
manipulate their psyches with false information and fake news – of course at
pecuniary interest that put their (media) services in treachery against the
public interests.
EFCC Acting Chairman, Ibrahim Magu |
Orilade said:
“To underscore the desperation of the editorial team that anchored the report,
Mr. Tobi Aworinde, contacted the Commission's acting spokesperson at exactly
9.44pm on Friday, July 12, 2019 on the subject matter. He (Mr. Aworinde) called
the spokesperson to know the position of the Commission on the petition
(against Alpha Beta and Ocean Trust Ltd). The spokesperson sent a response via
a WhatsApp platform (instantly). Unfortunately, this response was not captured
in The Punch report.
“When
contacted for (why) the response of the spokesperson was not reflected in the
report, Mr. Aworinde replied and said: 'I forwarded the message as soon as I
got it. It must have been the race to press. We were behind on our production
deadline when I called for the reaction. My apologies, Sir'”.
But with this
reply, the Commission was convinced that the newspaper published its story with
ulterior motive. “There is no doubt that 'the race to press' and 'we were
behind our production deadline…' as explained by Aworinde (the reporter) is
suggestive that there was an agenda and a motive”, Orilade concluded.
Not to leave
any stone unturned in the same breath of the rejoinder, the EFCC went further
to explain the true position of the Dapo Apara's petition as given to The Punch thus: “It is erroneous for the
newspaper to claim that the Commission did not do anything in respect to the
petition for one year… While not denying the fact that such petition was
received on Alpha Beta by the Commission last year July, preliminary
investigation has shown that the petitioner did not substantiate the allegation
contained in his petition... If the petitioner has any further proof with
regards to the petition, our doors are wide open. As a tradition, we do not
deal on hearsays. We act on facts and raw data. The Commission will not allow
anybody to drag its name into the mud for ill-motive reasons”.
Also enraged
by The Punch's story was the
Simmonscooper Partners, the firm through which the newspaper linked the
Vice-president to the petition. Describing the publication as “defamation” of
its corporate goodwill and reputation, the firm came forth to establish the
proof of mischief as intended by the story. In an advertorial published in The Nation of July 18, Simmoncooper
Partners observed that the proof of malicious falsehoods contents of The Punch’s story began with the wrong
corporate address quoted for it.
“For the
avoidance of doubt”, the firm said, “Simmoncooper Partners has never retained a
physical address at 'B5, Falomo Shopping Complex, Southwest, Ikoyi, Victorial
Island... “A cursory inquiry by Punch
could have shown that this address is neither the firm's registered address nor
its principal office”.
The firm then
went further to “categorically states that it has never been retained by Ocean
Trust Limited for secretarial services as alleged by The Punch newspaper or at all… (And that) Ocean Trust Limited has a
subsisting Company Secretary that had been appointed since 2011, which fact was
curiously left out by The Punch in
the publication”. It then queried how the common sense of a supposed editorial
team of the like of Punch newspaper
would have to think and impute a motive that a lawyer holding brief for a
criminal suspect is also deemed to be a suspect for the crime. It queried
seemingly that even if Simmoncooper Partners were to be the Company Secretary
for Ocean Trust Limited, “the imputation that offering a professional services
to a company by itself created an association with alleged wrongdoing is
neither customary nor reasonable… Offering professional services cannot be
characterised as wrongdoing”.
And based on
this establishment of the ill-motive reasons, the firm held that the
publication was a direct assault of character assassination on its founders and
the entire staff. Accordingly, the firm threatened to sue The Punch if it failed to retract the story with apologies.
It said: “The
publication seems designed to damage the reputation of Simmonscooper Partners
and its past and current members rather than have any comment basis… The firm
is (therefore) aggrieved by the wanton mischievous and unprofessional manner in
which The Punch has published the defamatory statements in the publication. Simmoncooper
Partners intends to seek redress to the fullest extent available in law”.
Generally, followers
of events in the media sector would not fail to notice the gradual departure of
The Punch newspapers from its past
glory of a trusted media for cross-checking of news dished out by the uncompetitive
government’s media. Indeed, the debate engaging the public space about peoples'
distrust for the media is really a historical issue from time past. It was a
subject that contributed largely to the demise of government owned media houses
and consequentially informed the direct correlative thriving evolution of the
private owned print and electronic media.
This is
evident from the direct history of the death of Daily Times newspapers from the military government's
meddlesomeness, which came to the public knowledge that Nigerians were not
being truly informed about matters of governance. That dominant media, at least
in the Southern part of Nigeria, and as then a leg of government's institution,
became perceived as purveyor of falsehoods, informing a direct decline in its
fortune. This impression opened a wide space for the private sector media to
emerge with The Guardian newspaper
evolving as the pioneer.
Private Print Media |
Although while
The Tribune would have counted more
as the pioneer of the private sector print media, the political pedigree of the
founder, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, could not help to give it a distinguished
status of apoliticism which Felix Ibru brought to bear as a publisher of The Guardian.
Again, it may
be needful to connect the role of Nigerian public in the eventual race for
leadership struggle among the private sector print media that eventually
emerged.
While the
government began to grow its intolerance of The
Guardian and the newspaper began to suffer incessant assaults of military
siege, The Punch and National Concord newspapers began to
find opportunity to leverage upon as newspapers of the masses with cover price
that turned The Guardian to be a
newspaper of the elite and intellectuals in the perspective of Nigerians. But
the publisher of National Concord,
Chief MKO Abiola’s political pedigree as stalwart of National Party of Nigeria
(NPN) in the Second Republic and his failure to de-align his newspaper’s
publishing philosophy from his personal political interest caused the paper to
be tagged a private arm of the ruling NPN government’s media. With that, The Punch gained the edge over others
that included The Vanguard, The Sketch (a Southwest governments’
media) and The Tribune. The Champion newspaper that entered the
market and thrived on the strength of Igbo ethnic sympathy soon died in the
face of strict competition with The Sun
that later came on the same cultural philosophy with it.
With agitation
to end military rule in Nigeria, the public trust in the private media was
deepened. The media space was now completely dominated by the private sector
through a correlative growth that was directly proportional to the progressive
death of the governments’ owned media. This caused its (private media’s)
expansion with evolution of investigative journalism holding forth as a new
branch of the print-media and came as weekly magazines. The expanded consequential effect of that was also the opening
up of the broadcasting sector of the media to the private sector too. The African Independent Television (AIT)
and Ray Power FM Radio Station became
the pioneer and early leaders of the industry.
So obvious was
the trust of Nigerian public in the private sector media that even the late
General Sanni Abacha allegedly felt it was better for him to hijack AIT from
the founder, Dr. Raymond Dokpesi, for his agenda of transforming from military
Head of State to civilian President and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.
Dokpesi once alleged that Abacha offered to buy the broadcasting station for
N1billion.
With exit of
the military from the political sphere, the will of incisive and ethical
journalism that earned the private media its public trust became heavily
challenged, particularly effective with the infamous attempt of President
Olusegun Obasanjo's 'Third Term Agenda'. The schism in the landscape of the
private media along political linings became well discernible.
Consequently,
again, the public trust in the private media began to progressively decline
too. Wholesomely, therefore, in both the government and private media sector’s,
the absurdity of democratic rule in 20years thus far has rather thrown up
misfits in places of essential public interests that journalism is
constitutionally empowered to serve in part. In other words, the rots in the
politicians' caves have virulently infected the systemic space of the media
such that journalism has become the artillery of assaults by chicaneries
against systemic merits that ought to be feasible in terms of public education,
knowledge building, informed society and socialisation of virtues being
championed by the media as cause in setting social agenda.
INFORMED by this anathema, way back in
2011, Professor Ayo Olukotun raised a poser that could fit into his prescience
of today's further decline of journalism deeper into the abyss of practical
impunity with certificated quackery. He asked: “What then is the future of
educational role of the media and the tradition of public intellectual?”
In his attempt
to answer this question, he revealed the mindset that informed the question. He
said: “Like most things in Nigeria, decline and devaluation have set in to the
extent that although many journalists now parade several academic degrees, they
probably are not informative or as readable as was the case a decade or so ago”(The Nation, 22/12/11p21).
This opinion
is not too distinct from observations held in recent time in some quarters. One
school of thought here ascribes the media defect of declining ethical journalism
to dearth of well-grounded educated practitioners lined up for succession
planning in the editorial leadership of the print media houses. Another school
of thought, who particularly points to the declining media ethical value of The Punch however holds that this bad
fate of the newspaper is indicative of its share of the systemic rots of the
crass craze for materialism and self-economic prosperity above the public
interests for which the media acquires its constitutional powers of
independence from the government. It's a bug believed to have been caught from
this 20years of the Forth Republic that invoked it in all spheres of our lives
and across all age-class that make the current era of youth between 0-35years
age bracket the worse for it.
A part of
Civics Journal investigation results that found these schools' reasoning quite
valid could as well be located in many of The
Punch's unexciting and misinforming editorials. Of particular interest
among them was that of the edition of Tuesday, November 20, 2012. It was the
newspaper's contributing opinion to the raging but “unreasonable” allegation of
plots by then Governor Rauf Aregbe to Islamise Osun State. The editorial in
question was about the Governor's proclamation of public holiday for the observation
of Hijra – Islamic New Year.
Curiously, it
turned out that the newspaper’s Editorial Board simply strayed into a strange
terrain with a residual knowledge of the subject it was offering its opinion. This
in effect should literally suffice for description as arm-chair journalism. It
took a rejoinder from Femi Abbas of The
Nation to expose the anchor editors as “the harebrained lots”.
But the
newspaper had never looked back for a self-reflection on its straying to the
abyss of junk media. Rather its publications have continued to grow in bounds
and leap in merchandise of falsehoods and wallow in trade of misinformation to
innocent Nigerians.
One of its
most recent works of deliberate misinformation with the language of photo-ups
was the edition of Monday, June 24, 2019. The front page was splashed with
photos of some bad roads for which it alleged the Federal Ministry of Works,
Power and Housing had received a total sum of N757.48billion but yet remained
dilapidated. The insinuated corruption suspicion story came at the time this
magazine was gathering materials for this cover story, which was informed by
imperative investigation of the culpability of the major media houses in the
progressive drive of Nigerian state into a misinformed society.
The Punch
was at the time being understudied among the prime suspects from the outcry in
some quarters that “the newspaper was becoming a merchant of falsehoods, raking
in millions of naira from selling false information. This magazine decided to
cross-check the data with the concerned Ministry. The Punch did not disappoint in living up to this absurd impression
about it. It had just published another falsehood with manipulated information
reportage!!
From the
verified fact with the Ministry, it was evidently revealed that it was a total
sum of N521.919billion it received as cash-backing for road projects within the
four-year period specified by The Punch
report. This was against the total sum of N890billion that was the actual
budgetary appropriation for the combined three years of 2016, 2017 and 2018.
Besides, as
ethical fact-checking would have revealed to the media firm, some of the roads
listed by it were Trunk-B (state owned) roads like the Zamfara's Gusau-Dansadu
Road and the Osun's Ejigbo-Iwo Road. Likewise, it is an open knowledge that the
Lagos-Badagry Road as yet ongoing with dualisation expansion is a Lagos State
project over which the newspaper had among others reported the new Governor
Sanwo-olu's comments on the state of actions over it.
Also, many of
the listed roads, yet being Trunk-A though, were not in any way captured in the
years' budget for the period much less receiving any money for them as
erroneously reported by The Punch.
While Civics
Journal could not ascertain if its prompt enquiry informed it, but it worth
mentioning here that the story also provoked an official reaction by the Ministry
of Works, Power and Housing (as then was) by way of published rejoinder wherein
comprehensive clarifications were made to establish the falsehoods of the
story. And in the light of that, the Ministry advised in caveat that “media
organisations should therefore endeavour to cross-check their information so as
not to misinform the general public” (The
Nation, 03/07/19p30).
Followers of
this new cultural order of The Punch's
publication style are wondering if deliberate twist of facts in reportage of
events was an innovation being thrown up for a unique selling point in its
competitive race to a leadership position in the print media. This observation
yet came against the backdrop of how the newspaper uniquely reported the events
of formal inauguration of the new Cabinet ministers by President Muhammodu
Buhari for his second governance tenure on August 21, 2019.
In a rider to
the lead caption, it published that Buhari had barred the ministers from having
direct access to him and reported that the President said they could only see
him through his Chief of Staff, Abba Kyari. That the story as reported by The Punch had a deeper meaning that was
“tendentiously mischievous” should bespeak to the reasons for the reactions
both from the Presidency and some open-minded individuals.
From the
Presidency came, as should ordinarily be expected, the clarification of the
roles of Chief of Staff and that of the Secretary to the Government of
Federation (SGF). The President's Senior Special Assistant on Media and
Publicity, Malam Garba Shehu, said the explanation became necessary in view of
the ambiguous impression created in a “recent media reports and (as enhanced in
viral spread by) social media reports”
about a purported orientation statement made to the new cabinet members by the
President. He emphasised that the duo's roles yet remained the same as a
universal model it had ever being under the Presidential System of Government
as Nigeria adopted it from the United State of America (USA).
He explained
it in context: “In the traditional Presidential System, it is the primary
function of a Chief of Staff… to supervise the key State House staff, control
access to the office and person of the President, manage communications and
information flow and this includes that which binds the relationship with the
two other arms of government…When President Buhari explained to the ministers
that they would be expected to communicate with him and arrange scheduling to
meet with him primarily via the Chief of Staff, he did so as many of the Buhari
II (2nd Term) Cabinet ministerial appointment are new appointments and cannot
therefore be expected to know how matters of liaisons with the President
operates”.
Distinguishing
this yet from the roles of the Secretary to the Government of Federation, Shehu
stated further: “SGF on the other hand is responsible for ensuring the
effective coordination and monitoring of the implementation of government
policies and programmes. All cabinet matters must go through him”.
Generally,
while it amounts to editorial's creative ingenuity for a media house to set
agenda for the government, it is yet a condemnable ill-motive for the media to
mischievously generate a controversy out of existing fact of common sense
knowledge or common place unharmful universal order as thrown up by The Punch in its referenced story above.
As some
observers noted, a newspaper of its standing reputation with correspondents
covering the beat of governance from the inner workings of State Houses at both
the states and Presidency could only be artfully deceptive to claim ignorance
that informed such story that deliberately twisted the President's advisory
statement to his new cabinet members. It is a common knowledge in the media
industry that a functional media house that worth the primary value of a social
and informal educational institution cannot operate effectively with a culture
of arm-chair journalism. A newspaper is worth its social relevance only in so
far its publications are unquestionably reliable.
Besides, some
veteran journalists and media pundits consulted for incisive contributions to
this cover story hold that The Punch
could not be helping itself by making it a deliberate cultural habit to
continue publications of stories that attract rejoinders. “It is only digging
its own grave when the reading public begins to see it as practitioner of
arm-chair journalism”, a communication experts noted.
Another
academia claimed to have written off the newspaper as purveyor of fake news
that is yet operating only on the lifeline survival of its past glory. He said:
“It should therefore be regrettable to the contemporary management of The Punch that the newspaper that rose
to leadership of the print media in Nigeria through public trust in its
publications would regress so appreciably to becoming the champion of misinformation
with mint of falsehoods”
Actions are
underscored by motives. Readers are therefore wont to tendentiously ask this
about reasons for the emerging unwholesome practices of The Punch. In conscious answers to it, communication pundits and
political analysts were unanimous in opinion that the newspaper may have taken
a cause for pecuniary interest of economic and trade value of pen power in the
convention of politicians' warfare in struggle for powers.
This opinion
would seem justifiable from the curious coincidences of personages of the Lagos
progressives' politicians making up victims of the established ill-motive
unethical reportage of the newspaper thus far. For instance, the corruption
suspicion story about the Ministry of Works, Power and Housing that covered the
four-year period of Babatunde Raji Fashola as the substantive Minister and
political head of the Ministry of Works would hardly be devoid of a motive to
deceptively question the integrity of the man, particular given the obvious
deliberate misinformation established as the mischievous content of the story.
With reference
to The Punch's Publication of
Simmoncooper and Partners story, The
Nation newspaper published that it was a war of politicians’ struggle for
power in 2023 that was starting earnestly.
With a front
page bold caption that reads “2023: Osinbanjo, Tinubu face smear campaign”, The Nation's story would seem to imply
that The Punch was rather a pen power
of a group of politicians pushing an aggressive assault of character
assassination against the person of Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the National Leader of
the ruling party, All Progressives Congress (APC).
The Nation
claimed to have gathered in its investigations that “an agenda for a prolonged
smear campaign has been put in place beginning with the printing of posters in
Dubai by a Kaduna-based politician against Tinubu. It went further to describe
the campaign in quoted words of its sources as “the war that has now assumed a
media assault dimension will spread for two year… (in) a mission to prevent southward
shift of the Presidential powers in 2023”.
This
submission of The Nation nevertheless
finds many points of concurrence with the independent investigation of this
magazine. Indeed, a source in the Civics Journal's described this purported
anti-Tinubu campaign as “Mission to kill It” with ‘MKI’ as the code name.